View in Browser

Volume XVIII, Issue 30

July 31, 2025

 

PCC Rokita, S.A. HH Technology Corp. (In Re: HH Technology Corp.), Case No. 24-9002 (1st Cir. 2025).

A bankruptcy court may set a deadline for parties to join a pending involuntary bankruptcy proceeding.

 

CPI Security Systems, Inc. v. Vivint Smart Home, Inc., Case No. 24-1120 (4th Cir. 2025).

North Carolina’s Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act protects against fraud intentional interference, and unfair competition but does not require the claimant to rely on the objectionable statements.

 

Zeidman v. Lindell Management LLC, Case No. 24-1608 (8th Cir. 2025).

An arbitration panel exceeds its authority and its decision may be vacated when the panel considers evidence by ignoring unambiguous contract terms and imposing new obligations on a party.

 

Yuga Labs, Inc. v. Ripps, Case No. 24-879 (9th Cir. 2025).

A NFT (Non-Fungible Token) is a “good” and can accordingly be trademarked under the Lanham Act.

 

Bird v. Wardley (In Re: White), Case No. 24-403 (10th Cir. 2025).

Both directly received and indirectly received benefits may be considered when considering a fraudulent conveyance claim in bankruptcy proceedings.

 

Fucci v. First American Title Insurance Co., Case No. 24-4051 (10th Cir. 2025).

A title company that is not a party to a real estate PSA (purchase and sale agreement) which has an arbitration provision cannot be compelled to arbitrate claims arising out of the agreement on the basis of providing services under the PSA, third-party beneficiary status, agency, and equitable estoppel.

 

MONY Life Insurance Company v. Perez, Case No. 23-10770 (11th Cir. 2025).

An insurer is not entitled to seek unjust enrichment on a policy (i.e., a written contract) it paid benefits even if the insured lied to receive the benefits as Florida contract law does not permit an equitable claim when a contract exists between the parties.

 

Weinstein v. 440 Corp., Case No. 23-13807 (11th Cir. 2025).

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (a) permits the dismissal of a single plaintiff in a multiple-plaintiff case so long as all claims that the plaintiff brought against any defendant are dismissed.

 

For more information, please visit taftlaw.com.

Sign up for the newsletters here.

For past issues, visit here.

Author

Manny Farach

Facebook X Instagram LinkedIn

Unsubscribe  | Email Preferences  | Privacy Policy

 

This email was sent to: 38185e38-ffa5-4e0f-e873-118667285ead  
 

This email was sent by:  Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP

525 Okeechobee Boulevard

Suite 900

West Palm Beach, FL 33401