View in Browser

Volume XVIII, Issue 39

Oct. 2, 2025

 

Conti v. Citizens Bank, N.A., Case  No. 22-1770P-01A (1st Cir. 2025).

Rhode Island's interest-on-escrow statute is not preempted by the National Bank Act under the framework clarified in Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A. because it does not significantly interfere with national-bank powers under Cantero's multi-factor test.

 

Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc. v. Scranton Products, Inc., Case No. 23-2577 (3d Cir. 2025).

Sophisticated business entities should be held to their settlement waivers to ensure finality and efficacy, even when the agreement waives the right to appeal later erroneous court orders.

 

Sofaly/Malcolm v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, Case Nos. 24-2639 and 24-2640 (3rd Cir. 2025).

A trial court has Rule 11 and inherent authority to sanction attorneys who manufacture Fair Debt Collection Practices Act violations by fabricating handwritten debt dispute letters designed to fail.

 

For more information, please visit taftlaw.com.

Sign up for the newsletters here.

For past issues, visit here.

Author

Manny Farach

Facebook X Instagram LinkedIn

Unsubscribe | Email Preferences | Privacy Policy

 

This email was sent to: 38185e38-ffa5-4e0f-e873-118667285ead  
 

This email was sent by:  Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP

525 Okeechobee Boulevard

Suite 900

West Palm Beach, FL 33401